Skip to content

I am a Historic Preservationist.

January 19, 2012

I am a Historic Preservationist.

I love historic buildings, districts, landscapes, historic bridges, comprehensive planning,  sidewalks, rehabilitation, revitalization of downtown, small and local businesses, proper infill, kitschy roadside  Americana, blue highways, heritage tourism, National Parks, open space, maps, coffee and flamingos.

I will wade barefoot through flooded roads to get to the historic bridges.

I define myself as a historic preservationist and I’m proud of it. 

How do you define your profession?

Architectural Historian? Historian? Heritage preservationist? Heritage conservationist? Other?

And why?

Does it make a difference to you?

Please explain. I’m curious.

13 Comments leave one →
  1. Sabra Smith permalink
    January 19, 2012 9:55 am

    Such an amazing coincidence you would post this! I was just thinking last night about our conversation ages ago about the negative connotations that the phrase “historic preservation” has taken on, about other possible labels, and how the definition has changed and expanded dramatically!

    • January 28, 2012 12:24 pm

      Interesting. I don’t know how negative “historic preservation” actually is, but I know that many of us in the field infer that those outside of the field perceive negative connotations. I really don’t think that changing the name of the field is the answer. More to come on that subject!

  2. Mark J permalink
    January 19, 2012 10:24 am

    I have to say I agree completely with your post, except maybe for the flamingos…I’m indifferent to them!

    • January 28, 2012 12:25 pm

      Indifferent to flamingos? Oh Mark, how can you not love a pink bird? ha.

  3. January 19, 2012 10:27 am

    While I appreciate old buildings, my heart is on the old roads. I think of myself as a transportation historian in that context (though I make my living as a software developer).

  4. Paula Sagerman permalink
    January 20, 2012 4:18 pm

    So I’m not the only person who thinks about this stuff! I also call myself a historic preservationist, although I decided that my business title should be “Historic Preservation Consultant” because I thought it was the clearest way of describing what I do.

    When I worked for the Federal government, my title was Architectural Historian, and while the layperson might understand what that is more than “historic preservationist” (I got less blank stares and more “That must be very interesting…”), being an architectural historian is just part of what we do. (I also learned that many people – even professional planners – don’t know the difference between architecture and archaeology!)

    When I worked for a state government, I was a Historic Preservation Specialist, which I also think is a good title. As I wrote in your discussion about historic vs. historical, if we had one thing to call ourselves I think people would take historic preservation more seriously, but as long as the Feds call us “architectural historians” that won’t happen. :-)

    • January 28, 2012 12:29 pm

      Paula, an excellent point. It is so strange to me that the law is the National Historic Preservation Act, yet the qualification standards are “architectural historian.” Architectural historian doesn’t even begin to cover the range of work we do as preservationists. I do not define myself as an architectural historian for that reason.
      You and I need to have coffee sometime!

  5. January 22, 2012 7:03 pm

    I would define myself as someone that loves history and not only want to preserve it, but I want to share it. My husband and I started looking two years ago for a historic home that we could turn into a bed an breakfast. Last July we came across that perfect home. It is located on the property that James Madison was born on. The current home was built several years later in 1791. The current owner purchased the home in 1988 and restored it. It has been empty for almost 30 years now. The sad thing is that he has not allowed anyone to come on the property or to have any access to it. Also I don’t think he is as interested in the history of the home.

    The good news is that he is ready for someone to come in and do something with it. This will allow us to open the bed and breakfast of our dreams and to preserve what remains on the property. There are three outbuildiing, a Summer Kitchen, anIce House and a Smoke House that he was going to tear down. We have stopped him from doing so.

    Once we open, we not only will use the residence as a bed and breakfast, but we are going to host public events such as a Wine and Anitque weekend. This will allow the public to once again come and enjoy this beautiful home.

    If you want more information, please check out our blog here on WordPress at:

    http://bellegroveatportconway.wordpress.com/

    You can also visit our Facebook page at:

    Belle Grove at Port Conway – Landmark

    Michelle

    • January 28, 2012 12:30 pm

      Lovely, Michelle. I am following along with Belle Grove.

  6. January 23, 2012 2:04 pm

    I am writing a thesis that considers this very thought.
    I study historic preservation and I will gain a degree in it.
    I could tell you the ins-and-outs of historic preservation in the US.
    But, it is limiting.
    I prefer the conservation of our resources at global or macro-level, both natural or man-made, and I consider myself a heritage conservationist.

    • January 28, 2012 12:30 pm

      Jessica, interesting! I’d love to read your thesis.

Trackbacks

  1. Happy 5th Birthday Preservation in Pink! « Preservation in Pink

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,130 other followers